Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ForOldHack's commentslogin

This is a brilliant observation, in regards to the first edition's depiction of Gollum.

In the first edition, he was depicted as a large creature, and Tolkien was upset about it, and in the second edition, changed the description to small.

This information was gathered by a rare book seller who's videos I find immensely interesting.


I was walking down the street, and I saw a art/documentary style picture of a book seller, wearing a Fez, it seemed interesting, so I took a picture of it, and later fawned on it... until I realized that his books were on display, so I rotated the picture, and scanned the titles. There were three Greek tarot decks, which were interesting, and a book, that was about an old technology. I went to the library to see where I could check it out. No were in the city library, no where in the State University or State colleges, no where in the county collection... and then the librarian/Super-genius, suggested scanning the local library database, and found the book, in a small library, in the far corner of the state, and I filled out a form to request a two week loan... but two days to get here, and two days return, I would have the book for 10 solid days.

When I got it, I read through it, solid for three days. Wow. Stunning look at a technology in its infancy.

The name of the Bookseller was Luma Kunda. Thank you Mr Kunda. I later learned from someone at the nearby bus stop, that Mr Kunda possessed an eidetic memory.

I would have loved to hear him tell stories about what he saw in the tarot cards.


You could have renewed that book though right? I haven't actually ever done an interlibrary loan but for "in network" books seems I can continue renewing them indefinitely until the end of time.

If you have a list of ISBNs (in a github gist, pastebin, or similar), I am happy to purchase any the Internet Archive does not yet have in their collection for long term preservation and eventual lending. Thank you for sharing.

Dijkstra? What is your go-to Dijkstra paper? His papers are like The short stories of Philip K Dick. Everything seems fine and straight forward, until you step into another world.

You are indeed privileged. What you have gained by reading them, is more than an education: It would be a journey, to read them, and your commentary.

I picked up a science fiction book, in a recycle bin, that for the most part belonged there, except for one chapter... one short chapter-and after I read it, the world started to swirl... "Human language had by this time, become mostly telepathic." Thank you, Joe Haldeman.

And Thank you Edsger W. Dijkstra.


I think what I appreciate most are the smaller notes, that probably don't represent a publishable result in any way.

There was one where he describes a problem that he had seen in an elementary school -- find a fraction between a/b and c/d. Everyone he talked to had the same basic answer; find a common denominator, find the midpoint, and if necessary, double the denominator. So 2/3 and 3/4 -> 8/12 and 9/12 -> 16/24 & 18/24 -> 17/24. And to him it was immediately obvious that a better answer is just (a+c)/(b+d), which he immediately intuited but then set out to make a better proof for.



Let this lesson be learned: "In my frustration, I decided to punish this software by decompiling it to figure out how it worked,"

Note to self: Never piss off a programmer, while he is gaming. To quote: "You're gonna die for that." -Duke Nukem.


Rosetta 2. Rosetta was for Intel to emulate 68k, now if you could get Rosetta 2 to run under Rosetta, then you could run 68k, on an ARM, and if you could get the apple ][ emulator...

Rosetta 1 was for emulating PPC not 68k

I was at Best Buy in the Apple section, and I asked its AI "What is the best value in four year old MacBook pros." It pointed me directly at an over-under washer dryer for $3400. Quite obviously, it was trained, like a drooling puppy by Madison Ave.

Wait... don't tell me... there is an App for that.


Well, back in the day... The MacIIfx had video memory, ( dual ported ram ) that could be read and written to out of different ports. Wicked fast. It 486DX2s more than a year to catch up.

You mean Apple prices are notoriously over priced, over hyped, under powered, and

"Abdul Jabar, couldn't have made these prices, with a sky hook."


Don't I/you wish. The mechanical junction adds no delay, only manufacturing expense, and the delay of purchasing new systems to keep up with OS bloat.

Actually the opposite is true. Socketed RAM can be made to overclock and adjust timings, while soldered ram, no. Two Lenovo's one soldered ( Carbon X1 ), one T590, one slot: Crucial 16GB, 260-pin SODIMM, DDR4 PC4-19200. Exact same processor, the X1 is DDR3 soldered on 532.0 MHz PC3-1066. The T590, has DDR4, PC4-19200, 1200Mhz.

Both have a Core i7 8665U... and the T590 is much faster, with socketed ram.


I think you'll find that in the current day, high speed LP(?)DDR5 requires a better signal path than what the SODIMM can provide. Which is why laptop makers initially moved to soldered RAM before moving to CAMM (probably only for the high end ones).

Sir! I am typing this on a Lenovo Carbon X1, with soldered on ram, and you are EXACTLY CORRECT!

I would much prefer two SODIMM sockets with the option to go to 32MB shared video memory, or DDR4/DDR5. Give me OPTIONS!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: