Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Craighead's commentslogin

It's absurd that you're actually taking the position you are

e2ee in Instagram would be absurd

The existence of security vs convenience trade offs is not absurd. Security isn't free to add to a product.

I'm using both incessantly and having a great time.

Reminder, HN, you all live in the real world. Chinese state sponsored cyber threat actors use orb networks that are primarily made via strung together off the shelf routers. The literal companies that build and maintain these ORB networks also resell this capability to Russian military intelligence and cyber threat actors.

Was unfamiliar with orb networks. This [1] is a damn clever attack vector.

[1] https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/chi...


They just made up a fancy term for the age old proxy... Basically lifting the longstanding criticism of their "attribution" into their realm of bespoke nouns as if it's something exceptional.

(I also found it extra annoying as my current working expansion of ORB is O-Ring Boss)


I am interested in hearing more about the US state sponsored cyber threat actors

Fast16, stuxnet, apt-c-40

cisco aka "yet another backdoor"

Been downhill since Nixon bud.


hipaa*


Oops. Thanks for the correction.


Isn't ice the implementation of exactly what you're suggesting a new force be? They're already federal law enforcement.


This advice is not for everyone.

Categorizing yourself in a way that may purposefully stunt your growth and reduce opportunity for growth is a wasteful use of life.


That's something an extrovert would say :)

Strong words. I'd like to understand your choice of words here.

> Categorizing yourself

Also known as knowing yourself, your strengths, and your weaknesses.

> purposefully stunt your growth

A wild assumption that talking to everyone will magically let you grow. Some people just prefer to focus on people that matter to them.

> ... reduce opportunity for growth

By choosing to compete in an area that is your weakness, you already limited your growth potential.

> ... wasteful use of life

So refusing to talk to everyone is a wasteful use of life. Again, I find it more wasteful to talk to anyone instead of people who matter to me. Unless it's fun, of course.


Categorising / knowing yourself is important for sure - I think in the case of the extrovert/introvert thing, it's an important first step to helping yourself, because in my experience/anecdotally, a lot of introverts know they're different from others, yet feel insecure or anxious about it. Awareness and acceptance won't make you "not an introvert" suddenly, but it can help recover from the awkwardness, self-doubt and anxiety. Still anecdotally, me and some other people who (10, 15 years ago or so) learned about introversion found more peace with themselves, that it's OK to want to be home, and that they learn to say "no" or "you know something, I've had enough and am going home".

Learning about who you are helps you know your limits and boundaries, which means you can learn to do more within your comfort zone and how far you can stretch it, which means your comfort zone expands and you can do more. That's the kind of growth I think comes with categorising oneself.


Excellent points.

Knowing who you are and what your boundaries are is important. Being an introvert is not a weakness, as much as being an extrovert is not a strength. It's only that extroverts are louder and more assertive, and that way they convinced the majority of people in between that everyone should be an extrovert.


There's a certain amount of evidence that getting over anxiety is harder if you try to do it by doing the thing you are most anxious about.

An alternative is to do things which allow you to become more comfortable with a reasonable degree of personal risk. Which can include things like rock climbing which you do on your own.


How many JavaScript libraries does the average fortune 1000 developer invoke when programming?


That average fortune 1000 developer is still expected to abide by the licensing terms of those libraries.

And in practice, tools like NPM makes sure to output all of the libraries' licenses.


No, what they're saying is what they said, what you're implying reveals a strange bias. Web scraping through residential proxies? Please think through your thoughts more. There's much more effective and efficient ways to do so. Multiple bad actors, like ransomware affiliates, have been caught using residential proxy networks. But by all means, don't let facts and cyber threat intelligence get in the way.


>let facts and cyber threat intelligence get in the way

Appeal to authority by way of invoking the megacorp-branded "threat intelligence" capability (targeted PR exercise).


Residential proxies aren't used for scraping? That doesn't align well with my experience...


What are the much more effective and efficient ways — since you said it ?


This is a stunning false equivalency and is an irresponsible comparison.


You've made an emotional declaration, without an argument to justify it. For instance, it would be helpful to understand why you think it's a false equivalency, and in what way it is irresponsible.


If you want to contribute something to the discussion, do that, rather than just saying that you don't like the parent's argument, that's what the down button is for.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: