Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ChromaticPanic's commentslogin

Complete nonsense unless I benefit from infrastructure and social services from the median country

This is why people need to be protesting not the other way around.

Never attribute to blatant corruption, "4D chess move" . There isn't anything sneaky or smart about what Elon pulled here.

It's also about separately scaling your business logic from the data layer

Exactly, and any good ORM will let you drop down to pure SQL if you need to for the weird cases.

Doesn't have to be accurate. Just always set it to 30mins if it will never go past that. Most people will be pleased it finished sooner.

This just reeks of a lack of understanding of how transformers work. Unlike Markov Chains that can only regurgitate known sequences, transformers can actually make new combinations.


It's a very basic question. You can meet that by simply treating everyone with integrity and respect. This results in an inclusive workplace. It's not a trick question.


I feel like there’s already HR processes in place for someone who is creating a hostile workplace?

I prefer my yearly company expectations to be quantifiable with clear metrics.

And instead this is the kind of squishy question that eludes any kind of reasonable metric. And worse, its vagueness could lead to misunderstanding. And even worse, misunderstanding the question in any dimension seems like it could have actual repercussions.

Some commenters have said it’s as simple as being inclusive of dietary restrictions. Ok cool easy enough. Is that actually in a rubric?

What if I have a manager that thinks it means I should run in the annual LGBTQ+ 5K? Ok I’m willing to do that, I like to run and support those causes. But is that expectation written anywhere?

In short, I don’t think these kind of questions are ever as simple as “just don’t be a douchebag.”


> But is that expectation written anywhere?

in many of the F500 orgs I've worked at -- yes it is. unambiguously so.

diversity / inclusion / team building activities were explicitly called out as part of yearly goals and performance review metrics.

things like go to a women-in-tech event and just listen, or a black history month discussion, read a book about homelessness and minority communities, etc. I went on a postmodern literature spree and ended up reading a bunch of african and middle eastern authors and that qualified for the perf review.

the "LBGTQ 5k" is a laughably bad strawman and would never be required for a bunch of reasons.


You guys must really hate running (and love missing the point). It wasn't even intended to be a "bad straw man" -- I literally would be fine running a 5K. If it was a documented example of a way I could meet their expectations for creating an inclusive environment, I would totally run a 5K themed around one of the company-approved causes. Might even lead up a whole group of us from the company to run in it together.

The point was: Do they have actual documented examples of what they want from me when they put this on my performance review:

> What impact did your actions have in contributing to a more diverse and inclusive Microsoft?

I am glad your companies have given you documented examples of what they have wanted in this arena. I'm sure that helped make it easier for you to meet their expectations and avoid any potentially awkward confusion.


There's a difference between "inclusive" and "not hostile".

It's weird that you're making up scenarios that would obviously never happen like the 5k thing.


It’s weird to have vague, non-business expectations built into a yearly performance review.

If you can give me some more examples I’m happy to hear them.

So far, commentators have listed:

(1) dietary considerations for team meals. (2) participation in company ERGs (this has never been compulsory at any company I’ve worked at). (3) making up a series of words they hope will appease managers

None of this seems like it should be part of a yearly performance package?

Personally, if I had celiacs and found out people were using ordering me a gluten-free pizza as a critical input to their yearly performance reviews, I’d probably be a little weirded out. But then maybe I’d be one of the more popular folks in the office come lunch-and-learn day, so pros and cons I guess.


> I prefer my yearly company expectations to be quantifiable with clear metrics.

lol, yes, annual tech perf reviews. Known for clear and quantifiable metrics that are in no way based on squishy realities.


True it’s all kind of hand wavy at the end of the day for a lot of this performance review stuff.

This just seems to be especially hand-wavy, with an additional whiff of ideological litmus testing thrown on, which could go sideways in more problematic ways than “this year I reduced the frontend bundle size by 25%”


That's crazy spend for anyone making sub 100K


It is crazy for anyone making any amount. A $15k desktop is overkill for anything but the most demanding ML or 3D work loads, and the majority of the cost will be in GPUs or dedicated specialty hardware and software.

A developer using even the clunkiest IDE (Visual Studio - I'm still a fan and daily user, it's just the "least efficient") can get away without a dedicated graphics card, and only 32GB of ram.


No, it’s just a maxed out mac studio with 512gb unified ram. Nothing dedicated or specialty.

Honestly a huge chunk of it is the Apple internal SSD tax but who wants to wait for usb3 external i/o?


thats a crazy spend for sub-200k or even sub-500k

you're just building a gaming rig with a flimsy work-related justification.


I have a different computer for games and rarely have time to play them.


Recently added DBOS python to one of my FOSS projects. It's awesome, looking forward to seeing what that self hostable observability would look like. I have been looking in the DB and OTEL logs to debug development.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: