15 years ago, Google search was actually good and returned relevant results.

That seems like a particularly bad faith interpretation of their assertion.

I disagree. What makes Google Google nowadays is their size. For example, they are full of AI results because these sites optimise until they show up in Google results first pages. Why, because Google owns the largest share of the search market.

Kagi has 30k subscribers, it is totally uninteresting to these AI results farms. This is just one example, but I hope you see my point. I cannot see Kagi beginning to compare to Google.

I think what OP meant was that he dislikes kagi’s search algorithm on a specific ground that also happens to apply to Google. The way it’s phrased is pure trolling though, or clickbait if you prefer.