Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If I don't think of cost as a fundamental issue, what differences would I see between either approach? They're both barriers to my intent and I'm not on board with the reasoning behind erecting those barriers.


You missed the "without restrictions" part. You do not need to get the msi approved by Microsoft to distribute it.


It's an extra step in the process I only need to do on Windows, and the rationale behind it solely benefits Microsoft.

I'm not comparing Microsoft to Apple, I'm judging both of them against my intentions. Both companies throw up barriers to interfacing with their systems.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: